081488 08 Ruling Active

Tariff classification of a toiletry bag.

Issued January 24, 1989 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 4202.92.3030, 4202.92.1500

Headings: 4202

Product description

The merchandise involved designated as style P1135 is a flat top toiletry bag measuring approximately 4" by 7" by 2". It has a top fitted interior mirror and a vinyl lined compartment all secured by a top metal frame snap closure. Our New York office held in NYRL 825355 dated November 18, 1987, that style P1135, when composed of cotton, is classifiable under subheading 4202.92.1500, HTSUSA, as travel, sports and similar bags, with outer surface of textile materials, of vegetable fibers and not of pile or tufted construction, of cotton, other with duty at the rate of 7.2 percent ad valorem. The applicable textile category is 369. 2 It was also ruled that style P1135, when composed of 65 percent polyester and 35 percent cotton, is classifiable under subheading 4202.92.3030, HTSUSA, as travel, sports and similar bags, with outer surface of textile materials, other, of man made fibers, other with duty at the rate of 20 percent ad valorem. The applicable textile category is 369. You maintain that the instant bag should be considered flat goods for tariff purposes. Specifically, your bag composed of 100 percent cotton should be classified under subheading 4202.32.4000, HTSUSA, as articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag, with outer surface of textile materials, of vegetable fibers and not of pile or tufted construction, of cotton with duty at the rate of 7.2 percent ad valorem. The applicable textile category is 369. Further, if the bag is composed of 65 percent polyester and 35 percent cotton it should be classified under subheading 4202.32.9550, HTSUSA, as articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag, with outer surface of textile materials, other, other, of man made fibers with duty at the rate of 20 percent ad valorem. The applicable textile category is 670.

CBP rationale

It is our observation that style P1135 can be used as a travel accessory, to hold make up and toiletry type items, as well as, being capable of being placed in a pocketbook or purse. It is our opinion based on its overall design that the bag was intended to be a travel toilet bag and is more specifically provided for as a travel bag. Consequently, the classification set forth in NYRL 825355 were appropriate.

Full text

HQ 081488 January 24, 1989 CLA2 CO:R:C:G 081488 DFC CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: HTSUS 4202.92.1500; 4202.92.3030 David Krakauer VicePresidentOperations Roger Gimbel Accessories, 4 West 33rd Street, New York, N.Y. 10001 RE: Tariff classification of a toiletry bag. Dear Mr. Krakauer: In a letter dated December 15, 1987, you asked us to reconsider New York Ruling Letter (NYRL) 825355 dated November 18, 1987, concerning in part the tariff classification of a toiletry bag, style P1135, manufactured in China. This ruling letter will address only classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). FACTS: The merchandise involved designated as style P1135 is a flat top toiletry bag measuring approximately 4" by 7" by 2". It has a top fitted interior mirror and a vinyl lined compartment all secured by a top metal frame snap closure. Our New York office held in NYRL 825355 dated November 18, 1987, that style P1135, when composed of cotton, is classifiable under subheading 4202.92.1500, HTSUSA, as travel, sports and similar bags, with outer surface of textile materials, of vegetable fibers and not of pile or tufted construction, of cotton, other with duty at the rate of 7.2 percent ad valorem. The applicable textile category is 369.  2  It was also ruled that style P1135, when composed of 65 percent polyester and 35 percent cotton, is classifiable under subheading 4202.92.3030, HTSUSA, as travel, sports and similar bags, with outer surface of textile materials, other, of manmade fibers, other with duty at the rate of 20 percent ad valorem. The applicable textile category is 369. You maintain that the instant bag should be considered flat goods for tariff purposes. Specifically, your bag composed of 100 percent cotton should be classified under subheading 4202.32.4000, HTSUSA, as articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag, with outer surface of textile materials, of vegetable fibers and not of pile or tufted construction, of cotton with duty at the rate of 7.2 percent ad valorem. The applicable textile category is 369. Further, if the bag is composed of 65 percent polyester and 35 percent cotton it should be classified under subheading 4202.32.9550, HTSUSA, as articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag, with outer surface of textile materials, other, other, of manmade fibers with duty at the rate of 20 percent ad valorem. The applicable textile category is 670. ISSUE: Is the instant bag within the purview of the phrase "articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag" or is it more specifically described by the phrase "travel, sports and similar bags"? LAW AND ANALYSIS: It is our observation that style P1135 can be used as a travel accessory, to hold makeup and toiletry type items, as well as, being capable of being placed in a pocketbook or purse. It is our opinion based on its overall design that the bag was intended to be a travel toilet bag and is more specifically provided for as a travel bag. Consequently, the classification set forth in NYRL 825355 were appropriate. HOLDING: Style P1135, when composed of cotton, is classifiable under subheading 4202.92.1500, HTSUSA. Style P1135, when composed of 65 percent polyester and 35 percent cotton, is classifiable under subheading 4202.92.3030, HTSUSA. Sincerely John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →