General Note 12(l), HTSUS; transshipment.
Issued September 26, 1996 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
Product description
According to the submission, automobiles manufactured in Mexico are transported under bond through the United States to a port processing center in Canada. In Canada, the vehicles will be further processed in a Customs bonded warehouse facility. You indicate that such processing may include replacing or correcting defective items and adding optional equipment (e.g., radios). Thereafter, the vehicles will be exported from Canada to the United States for entry under a claim for NAFTA preference. You have asked us to assume that the automobiles would qualify "as goods originating in the territory of a NAFTA party," pursuant to General Note 12 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), if the automobiles were entirely manufactured and processed in Mexico and exported directly to the United States.
CBP rationale
Subdivision (l) of General Note 12 states: Transshipment. A good shall not be considered to be an originating good by reason of having undergone production that satisfies the requirements of this note if, subsequent to that production, the good undergoes further production or any other operation outside the territories of the NAFTA parties, other than unloading, reloading or any other operation necessary to preserve it in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of Canada, Mexico and/or the United States. (Emphasis supplied). Regulations implementing this provision are found at 19 CFR 181, Appendix, Part VI, Section 16. General Note 12(l) provides that goods which otherwise qualify for preferential treatment are not originating if they undergo processing unrelated to their preservation or transport outside the NAFTA territories. By its terms, the note does not apply to goods which undergo such processing within the NAFTA territories. In view of the foregoing, transporting and processing the vehicles as described above would not preclude them from qualifying for preferential tariff treatment as originating goods.
Full text
HQ 004106 September 26, 1996 RR:IA 004106 ch CATEGORY: NAFTA Martha L. Brown Customs Administrator Volkswagen of America, Inc. 3800 Hamlin Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Re: General Note 12(l), HTSUS; transshipment. Dear Ms. Brown: This is in response to your letter, dated August 13, 1996, requesting an advance ruling concerning the eligibility of certain automobiles for preferential treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). FACTS: According to the submission, automobiles manufactured in Mexico are transported under bond through the United States to a port processing center in Canada. In Canada, the vehicles will be further processed in a Customs bonded warehouse facility. You indicate that such processing may include replacing or correcting defective items and adding optional equipment (e.g., radios). Thereafter, the vehicles will be exported from Canada to the United States for entry under a claim for NAFTA preference. You have asked us to assume that the automobiles would qualify "as goods originating in the territory of a NAFTA party," pursuant to General Note 12 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), if the automobiles were entirely manufactured and processed in Mexico and exported directly to the United States. ISSUE: Whether transporting and processing the automobiles within the NAFTA territories in the manner described above precludes them from qualifying for preferential tariff treatment as originating goods under the NAFTA? LAW AND ANALYSIS: Subdivision (l) of General Note 12 states: Transshipment. A good shall not be considered to be an originating good by reason of having undergone production that satisfies the requirements of this note if, subsequent to that production, the good undergoes further production or any other operation outside the territories of the NAFTA parties, other than unloading, reloading or any other operation necessary to preserve it in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of Canada, Mexico and/or the United States. (Emphasis supplied). Regulations implementing this provision are found at 19 CFR 181, Appendix, Part VI, Section 16. General Note 12(l) provides that goods which otherwise qualify for preferential treatment are not originating if they undergo processing unrelated to their preservation or transport outside the NAFTA territories. By its terms, the note does not apply to goods which undergo such processing within the NAFTA territories. In view of the foregoing, transporting and processing the vehicles as described above would not preclude them from qualifying for preferential tariff treatment as originating goods. HOLDING: Under the circumstances of this transaction, the automobiles are not precluded from qualifying for preferential tariff treatment as originating goods. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Tariff Classification Appeals Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Country of origin determination for decorative pillow; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift
Country of origin determination for decorative pillows; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift
Country of origin determination for a faux rabbit fur pillow; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift
Country of origin determination for a faux rabbit fur throw; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(5); last country where an important assembly or manufacturing process occurred
Country of origin determination for a sheet set and comforter; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4); most important assembly or manufacturing process; 19 CFR 102.13; De Minimis
The classification and country of origin of a gold bracelet
The classification and country of origin of a gold bracelet
The classification and country of origin of a gold necklace
Country of origin determination for duvet covers, pillow shams and quilts; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4); most important assembly or manufacturing process
Country of origin determination for a coir mat; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(1); wholly obtained or produced in a single country
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →